Monday, 28 May 2012

BioMed Central Blog > Assessing Research Impact at the Article Level

Posted by Ciaran O'Neill / Friday May 25, 2012

The impact of academic research has long been measured using citations, often with the Journal Impact Factor being used to assess individual publications within it. However, the Impact Factor is a journal level - not an article level - metric and, as academic publishing and the surrounding discussion moves increasingly onto the web, novel opportunities to track and assess the impact of individual scientific publications have emerged.

These web-based approaches are starting to offer an article-level perspective of the way research is disseminated, discussed and integrated across the web. The hope is that a broader set of metrics to complement citations will eventually give a more comprehensive view of article impact, ... .

Altmetric.com is one of a growing number of web-based tools taking a novel approach to the assessment of scholarly impact – it aggregates the mentions on twitter and social media sites, and coverage in online reference managers, mainstream news sources and blogs to present an overview of the interest a published article is receiving online. BioMed Central has today added the Altmetic.com 'donut' to the about page of published articles – the donut will display for articles receiving coverage which has been tracked by Altmetric.com, along with an article score ... .


The donut visualization shown on the 'about this article' page aims convey information about the type of attention the article has received ... .

This summary supplements our existing article-level measures of impact – article accesses and citations are displayed on all 'about this article' pages, ... . [snip].

As more indicators of article performance, visibility and impact emerge, the hope is that authors, readers and funding institutions will be able to assess research impact in a way which is more informed than relying on Impact Factors alone. [snip]. We plan to keep adding to this range of metrics and indicators, as they continue to expose a fuller image of research impact.

Source and Fulltext Available At 

[http://bit.ly/JFNXAw]

Saturday, 19 May 2012

Latest Developments in PLoS Article-Level Metrics


By Richard Cave
Posted: May 14, 2012

 PLoS continues to expand and refine Article-Level Metrics (ALM). This suite of performance measures (including usage statistics, citations, trackbacks from blogs, bookmarks, social media coverage and user comments and ratings) are available on every PLoS article so that authors and the scientific community can assess the impact of the research. We are also broadening our outreach activities to spread the word on ALM to more researchers, technical experts, other publishers, funders, and institutions.

A key part of the current effort is to convene scholarly metrics thought leaders to help spearhead the widespread adoption of ALM. By engaging leading authorities in metrics, and bringing them together in a working group, PLoS can better coordinate the development of ALM. The following experts serve on the ALM Technical Working Group in an advisory role to help steer the direction of PLoS ALM implementation:

  • Pedro Beltrao, University of California San Francisco
  • Phil Bourne, University of California Santa Cruz
  • Bjoern Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Martin Fenner, PLoS
  • Duncan Hull, European Bioinformatics Institute
  • Cameron Neylon, Science and Technology Facilities Council Oxford
  • Heather Piwowar, NESCent, Duke University
  • Jason Priem, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Dario Taraborelli, Wikimedia Foundation
  • Jevin West, University of Washington
  • Johan Bollen, Indiana University

 [snip]

Source and Fulltext Available

PLoS > Article-Level Metrics


PLoS Article-Level Metrics (ALM): A Research Impact Footprint

Article-Level Metrics consist of a transparent suite of established measures that offer a view into the overall performance and reach of a research article;
  • Videos and Presentations
  • Upcoming Events
  • Latest News

Source and Links Available At 



New Data Sources Added to the PLoS Article-Level Metrics Program > Feb 2012


Cameron Neylon > Article-level Metrics > 2010


Article-Level Metrics at PLoS - What Are They, and Why Should You Care > Nov 2009


Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication


The Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication seeks to share useful innovations, both in thought and in practice, with the aim of encouraging scholarly exchange and the subsequent benefits that are borne of scrutiny, experimentation and debate. As modes of scholarly communication, the technologies and economics of publishing and the roles of libraries evolve, it is our hope that the work shared in the journal will inform practices that strengthen librarianship and that increase access to the "common Stock of Knowledge."

Current Issue: Volume 1, Issue 1 (2012)
  
Video Credit: Defining Scholarly Communication, created/owned by the contributors and produced by Kathryn Pope and Vin Aliberto, Center for Digital Research and Scholarship, Columbia University Libraries/Information Services. CC-BY.

Editorial

What is in a Name? Introducing the Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Isaac Gilman and Marisa Ramirez

In Memoriam: Deborah Barreau Gary Marchionini

Commentary

The Movement to Change Scholarly Communication Has Come a Long Way – How Far Might It Go? / Joyce Ogburn

Coming in the Back Door: Leveraging Open Textbooks To Promote Scholarly Communications on Campus / Steven J. Bell

Point & Counterpoint: Is CC BY the Best Open Access License? / Klaus Graf and Sanford Thatcher

Research Articles

The Anatomy of a Data Citation: Discovery, Reuse, and Credit / Hailey Mooney and Mark P. Newton

The Accessibility Quotient: A New Measure of Open Access / Mathew A. Willmott, Katharine H. Dunn, and Ellen Finnie Duranceau

Does Tenure Matter? Factors Influencing Faculty Contributions to Institutional Repositories /
Anne M. Casey

Practice Article

Innovation Fair Abstracts, SPARC 2012 Open Access Meeting / Abstract Authors'

Theory Article

Open Access Publishing Practices in a Complex Environment: Conditions, Barriers, and Bases of Power / Thomas L. Reinsfelder

Brief Reviews of Books and Products

Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide by David J. Solomon
Caitlin Bakker

Starting, Strengthening, and Managing Institutional Repositories / Jonathan A. Nabe
Therese F. Triumph

Embedding Repositories: A Guide and Self-Assessment Tool by JISC / Michele I. Wyngard

Source and Links Available At 

Girls Generation - Korean